Ok, before we move further on this controversial topic, allow me to put a disclaimer here that what I am writing is merely a speculation like a conspiracy theory on the US government testing alien technology at Area 51.
Now that we cleared that hurdle allow me to state the myth so someone can send a letter to Mythbusters and ask them to verify it since it has a 5 stars popularity rating.
Myth 1- You would automatically get full ride upon admission
Myth 2- You stand a higher chance for admission seeing that your financial situation is not considered.
Myth 3-The term “international” is universal as defined by Merriam Webster dictionary.
Well, the first one is easy. No you don’t get full ride just like that. There are many methods of financial package calculation which are probably not revealed by any colleges. Then again, they could just throw any number they like at you and explain they painstakingly calculated so they won’t increase it substantially unless you can prove that some Ivy school offered you more and they badly need your oboe talents.
The thing is, most applicants are ranked. How else would they derive the ACCEPT, WAIT LIST and REJECT pool? The drama lies among accepted applicants of course. The best of the bunch (most likely heading to an Ivy) would definitely require the need-blind school to sweeten his offer like free plane tickets plus hotel family package to Honolulu every summer. The middle percentile will get ordinary offer no surprise here, and the bottom of the pile gets the scraps of the budget. You only get to worry about the dilemma of choosing which school to attend if you have the stats stated in the next paragraph. And yes the admission committee can smell out Ivy bound students like shark is able to detect a drop of blood from miles away. How? Remember that International Student Financial Aid Application (ISFAA) form you filled in with the section “What other schools are you applying to?”. Oh yes, a dead giveaway that makes a senior citizen stand up from his wheel chair and go “A-HAH!” Not implying that the admission committee are all that “wise” of course.
The second one is the big one. No you don’t have a higher chance, if anything, your chances are significantly lower in a need blind school unless you have perfect SATs (NOT superscored!), triple legacy, insane ECs (I’m talking about Olympiads, INTEL, world class classical violinist, triple varsity sports, breakthrough research works with some scientist at an exotic location like Galapagos etc.), lived in 10 cities around the world, Nobel Lit Prize essays, fawning teacher recommendations and your interviewer got so bulldozed over by your sex appeal that they’d write whatever if you promised them another date.
But, I digress. The reason is because, you will also be competing against the crem de la crem of the entire world gunning for American education. Once a college makes an announcement that is is becoming need-blind, it spreads like wildfire on tinder to the entire application population around the world who are looking for fresh blood. Yes, it means you will be competing in a pool with thousands of applicants with the stats of the previous paragraph -/+ underrepresented minority status.
A need-based school on the other hand who is too stingy to spend money on a PR agent or rather would like to keep their Hidden Ivy status…well…hidden, would definitely be unheard of since its need-blind peers are hogging the limelight. This means less competition. And if you need me to explain what less competition means, then you’d be better off not retaking that SAT scores of yours.
This will probably draw hellfire but need-blind status is somewhat a farce. Any school can declare a status of need-blind in my opinion seeing that there are no rules to govern how the selection process takes place or how aid is distributed for that matter. For example, 10 points if this guy is an Olympiad or 2 points if he has legacy status then they add up the points of all applicants and see who wins an admission. The move is not as drastic as it seems. Anyhow, the same number of students gets in so the change of policy can only mean better quality and quantity of applicants to fill the class with.
Why would they go that far? To steal potential Ivy bound students to improve student body and also to drastically drop their rate of admittance. For what reason? The numbers look good on the viewbook. No really, they send them to important people and get another extra billion in endowments for such a good work. And this translates to? The board of directors (or any other term) get a 2 year salary bonus and laughed their way to the bank. Probably not, but hey, business takes first class as education goes economy.
So, you’re probably googling international students’ financial aid package to check my story. While it may be true HYP, MIT and others do offer pretty good aid in general since money is not an issue to them. Keep in mind, colleges tend to give out misleading information to stay up the USNews-WR list. Why? Refer to reasons in previous paragraph. Also, international students can mean students with permanent residence or green card so they qualify for Federal Aid as well( I think). Plus, some internationals like Mexicans and Canadians are under need-blind whilst the rest of the world are under need-based policy. Then there are the “international” a.k.a. globe trotting Americans (yes, they hold a US passport) who’ve lived abroad all their lives who gets Federal Aid. So yeah, watch out for the word “average amount” and don’t bet your hedge funds on it. Besides, it has been claimed that colleges cheat at statistics which is the basis of some arguments against college rankings. To what extent is this true? I don’t know.
Basically, we can only know the shocking truth if the The Gatekeepers version 2.0 is coming out since all this admission thing is so top secret.
